Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Len Feder's avatar

Where I'm at right now, in understanding Twin Peaks, is that it's a bit like Inland Empire in that it does not have a solid unifying theme. I think David Lynch just swung from the hip, and was more concerned with how he felt about a particular scene than how to unify his story. I think a lot of the events in Twin Peaks season 3 have little or nothing to do with the plot. For example, the Audrey scenes. I think they have absolutely nothing to do with the story, nothing at all. I think David Lynch and Sherilyn Fenn were having disagreements about what to do with the Audrey character in season 3, and as a result of their arguing, Lynch put himself into the story as Charlie and warned Sherilyn that he was thinking of discontinuing her story completely. I think Charlie is David Lynch. And that has exactly nothing to do with the rest of the story. I like Charlie constantly telling Audrey that he's tired. I think Lynch was tired of Sherilyn's arguing. I really think Charlie's whole purpose in the season was to express what David Lynch was feeling about Sherilyn. And I think that in almost all of David Lynch's movies he flies by the seat of his pants and doesn't have a unified story in mind. He doesn't comment on what his stuff means because it's all pretty fuzzy in his own mind.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts